Kinijos teismas patvirtina kriptovaliutų prekybą, bet ne jos naudojimą kaip grynųjų pinigų pakaitalą

Kinijos teismas patvirtina kriptovaliutų prekybą, bet ne jos naudojimą kaip grynųjų pinigų pakaitalą

A Chinese court has ruled that citizens can still trade kriptokursai despite the country’s ban on digital asset services. Notably, China has an existing ban on cryptocurrency trading, citing a threat to finansų sektorius stabilumas. 

The Beijing Number One Intermediate People’s Court valdė that interested investors can only trade cryptocurrencies but should be treated as virtual assets and not act as a currency. 

The ruling was made in a case involving a crypto loan in Litecoin (LTC) with a promise of paying interest in digital currencies. The atvejis specifics indicate that in 2015, Zhai Wenjie loaned his friend Ding Hao 50,000 Litecoin. Zhai Wenjie stated that Ding Hao promised to pay 1,000 Litecoins as interest per month, a matter the defendant denied. 

Litecoin currency status

Although the court acknowledged the existing Chinese ban on kripto valiutos prekyba, the presiding judge noted that Litecoin could not be treated as a currency. According to the court, the crypto is not issued by a monetary authority alongside a lack of backing from legal and financial frameworks. 

„Pagal realius administracinius teisės aktus ir bylas mūsų šalis tik neigia virtualios valiutos piniginius požymius ir draudžia jos kaip valiutos apyvartą, tačiau pati virtuali valiuta yra įstatymo saugoma virtuali nuosavybė“, – nurodė teismas. 

Interestingly, amid the existing ban on Bitcoin (BTC), the court considered Litecoin, noting that the country has laws governing such assets. 

In the case, the judge cited a lack of laws prohibiting the perception of Litecoin as an illegal asset. Therefore, the judge ruled in favor of the complainant for proving that the defendant borrowed a cryptocurrency and ordered him to return Litecoin.

Kinijos pozicija dėl kriptovaliutų 

The ruling mirrors a recent decision by a court based in Chaoyang that directed companies not to pay salaries in Tether (USDT) due to the ban on the circulation of digital assets. 

It is worth noting that different Chinese regional courts have issued varied judgments on the trading and handling of digital assets. For instance, as pranešė by Finbold in May, the Shanghai High People’s Court ruled that Bitcoin has a ‘certain economic value’ and is protected by the country’s laws.

Interestingly, despite the ban on crypto services, new data indicates that more Chinese residents are still trading in different assets. As pranešė by Finbold, China now ranks in the tenth spot globally in crypto adoption.

Source: https://finbold.com/chinese-court-approves-crypto-trading-but-not-its-use-as-a-cash-substitute/